Home Regulation News MyConstant Founder Fined $10.5M for Misusing Funds in Terra Stablecoin Debacle
Regulation News

MyConstant Founder Fined $10.5M for Misusing Funds in Terra Stablecoin Debacle

Share
MyConstant Founder Fined $10.5M for Misusing Funds in Terra Stablecoin Debacle
Share

The Terra ecosystem collapse continues to send shockwaves through the cryptocurrency industry, with another significant development emerging from the defunct lending platform MyConstant. The platform’s founder, Duy Huynh, has reached a $10.5 million settlement agreement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission following allegations that he misappropriated customer funds to make high-risk bets on TerraUSD (UST) prior to its spectacular failure.

Operating under both his Vietnamese and American identities, Huynh marketed MyConstant as a conservative crypto lending service offering steady returns reaching up to 10%. However, rather than delivering on these promises, he redirected $11.9 million in investor funds toward UST investments—the stablecoin that infamously crashed in 2022 and triggered widespread market turmoil.

Massive Losses and Misuse of Funds

What investors believed to be a secure investment opportunity quickly transformed into a financial catastrophe. The UST investments resulted in losses of nearly $8 million, while the SEC additionally alleges that Huynh inappropriately used more than $400,000 for personal expenditures. Throughout this period, he allegedly provided investors with deceptive communications designed to hide the company’s deteriorating financial condition.

Instead of fighting the allegations in court, Huynh chose to settle the matter. The agreement requires him to return $8.3 million to affected investors, pay $1.5 million in interest charges, and remit a $750,000 civil penalty—all while maintaining his innocence. MyConstant ceased operations in November 2022 and transferred its remaining assets into a creditor trust, though only a small portion of the lost funds has been recovered thus far.

Regulatory Implications for Crypto Lending

This case represents another significant enforcement action by the SEC against crypto lending platforms that failed to protect investor interests. The settlement underscores the regulatory scrutiny facing digital asset businesses and highlights the risks associated with unregulated lending services in the cryptocurrency space.

Market Implications

This settlement adds to the ongoing regulatory pressure facing crypto lending platforms but is unlikely to significantly impact broader market sentiment given the contained nature of the case. The enforcement action reinforces existing concerns about platform transparency and investor protection in the digital asset lending sector.

Share
Written by
Cameron Holt

Cameron Holt is a seasoned Web3 analyst and blockchain educator from the U.S., known for his deep dives into everything from zk rollups and Layer 2 innovation to yield farming mechanics and on-chain security. With a developer’s mindset and a strategist’s vision, Cameron tracks token unlocks, uncovers hidden airdrop opportunities, and decodes technical trends for a fast-moving crypto audience. Whether it's AI-powered tools, decentralized gaming, or the latest rugpulls, he brings clarity, speed, and sharp insight to every corner of the blockchain world.

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Ripple Pushes Back on Crypto Bill Over SEC Powers and Token Classification Concerns

Enterprise blockchain company Ripple has submitted its response to a request for...

Singapore Tycoon Ong Beng Seng Pleads Guilty in Case Tied to Former Minister

Hotel tycoon Ong Beng Seng, who holds the franchise for the Formula...

Ripple CTO Clarifies Kraken Cofounder’s Nuanced Views on XRP and Regulation

A casual IPO poll from Ripple CTO David Schwartz sparked renewed discussion...

Nigeria Opens Doors to Stablecoins as Hong Kong Limits Issuer Licenses

A year after issuing its first batch of digital asset exchange licenses,...